Ford v. Sandhills Medical Foundation Inc
Plaintiff: Joanne Ford
Defendant: Sandhills Medical Foundation Inc
Case Number: 4:2021cv02307
Filed: July 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for John A. Yanchunis. Signed by Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell on 9/14/2021.(hcic, )
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John A. Yanchunis ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-10065426) by Joanne Ford. Response to Motion due by 9/24/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit/Application, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Bess, Dylan) Modified on 9/10/2021 to remove proposed order (hcic, ).
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Joanne Ford.(Bess, Dylan)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 COVID-19 COURTROOM ETIQUETTE REMINDERS (hcic, )
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Matthew S. Freedus. Signed by Chief Judge R Bryan Harwell on 8/4/2021.(hcic, ) Modified on 8/4/2021 to edit text(hcic, ).
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Matthew Freedus ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-9994757) by Sandhills Medical Foundation Inc. Response to Motion due by 8/17/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit In Support of Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Matthew Freedus)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Wright, Michael)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sandhills Medical Foundation Inc.(hcic, )
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Chesterfield County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-13-00399 (filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9980591), filed by Sandhills Medical Foundation Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Deeming Notices, #3 Acceptance of Service, #4 HHS Notification, #5 US AG Notification)(hcic, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ford v. Sandhills Medical Foundation Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joanne Ford
Represented By: Dylan Artell Bess
Represented By: John A Yanchunis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandhills Medical Foundation Inc
Represented By: Jessica Lerer Fickling
Represented By: Joseph Preston Strom, Jr
Represented By: Michael D Wright
Represented By: Vincent A Sheheen
Represented By: Matthew Sydney Freedus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?