Burgest v. U.S.P. Atlanta, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta Georgia-F.B.O.P.
| Earl Hughes Burgest |
| U.S.P. Atlanta, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta Georgia-F.B.O.P., Mrs. Hollinger, Dr. Martin, Dr. Eziakor and Dr. Tesh |
| 4:2021cv02357 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
***DOCUMENT MAILED: #15 Order on Motion for Reconsideration w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Earl Hughes Burgest, #53598-004, WFCI, PO Box 340, Salters, SC, 29590 (dsto, )
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Plaintiffs motion to reconsider (Dkt. No. 14) is DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/8/21.(ltap, )
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Reconsideration re #8 Order on Report and Recommendation, by Earl Hughes Burgest. Response to Motion due by 9/14/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 10
Additional Attachments to Main Document #6 Objection to Report and Recommendation. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 9
***DOCUMENT MAILED: #8 Order on Report and Recommendation w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Earl Hughes Burgest, #53598-004, WFCI, PO Box 340, Salters, SC, 29590 (dsto, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER and OPINION: The Court ADOPTS the R & R as the Order of the Court. (Dkt. No. 4). The Court TRANSFERS this case and all filings to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division.AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/20/21.(ltap, )
|
|
Filing 6
OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendation by Earl Hughes Burgest. Reply to Objections due by 8/30/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) Modified on 8/23/2021. See #10 for additional attachments. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing 5
***DOCUMENT MAILED: #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Earl Hughes Burgest, #53598-004, WFCI, PO Box 340, Salters, SC, 29590 (dsto, )
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this case and all its filings, including the Motion for informa pauperis, be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northen District of Georgia, Atlanta Division for further handling. Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/02/2021. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Earl Hughes Burgest. Response to Motion due by 8/12/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Inquiry, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against U.S.P. Atlanta, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta Georgia-F.B.O.P., filed by Earl Hughes Burgest. Service due by 10/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
