United States of America v. $47,100.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
| United States of America |
| $47,100.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY |
| Lubna D Hopkins |
| 4:2021cv02370 |
| July 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Lubna D Hopkins. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Woods, Fred) |
| Filing 9 CLAIM Verified Claim by $47,100.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY. (Woods, Fred) |
| Filing 8 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date September 01, 2021. (Attachments: #1 Advertisement Certification Report)(Sherard, Carrie) |
| Filing 7 COVID-19 COURTROOM ETIQUETTE REMINDERS (hcic, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Action by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Sherard, Carrie) |
| Filing 5 WARRANT Returned Executed as to $47,100.00 in United States Currency. (Attachments: #1 Warrant of Arrest in rem)(Sherard, Carrie) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT IN REM ISSUED. (hcic, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION FOR WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM by United States of America. (hcic, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $47,100.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, filed by United States of America. Service due by 10/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 Verification)(hcic, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
