Burdick v. LuLus Myrtle Beach LLC et al
Katie Burdick |
LuLus Myrtle Beach LLC doing business as Lucy Buffetts LuLus doing business as LuLus North Myrtle Beach, Lucy Buffett, George Martin, Gerald Tipton, Cheryl Coesens, Vanessa Owens, Robin Hinton, Douglas "Todd" Goings and Tonya Clayton |
4:2022cv00123 |
January 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph Dawson |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION to Stay re #4 MOTION to Remand by Katie Burdick. Response to Motion due by 3/16/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Davis, Lisa) |
Filing 10 Rule 26(f) Report by Katie Burdick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum Setting forth Plaintiff's Position on Scheduling Order)(Davis, Lisa) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Lisa Poe Davis for March 10, 2022, March 11, 2022; April 11, 2022 through and including April 13, 2022; and September 26, 2022 through and including October 3, 2022 (Davis, Lisa) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Remand Plaintiff's Motion for Remand to State Court Response filed by Lucy Buffett, Tonya Clayton, Cheryl Coesens, Douglas "Todd" Goings, Robin Hinton, LuLus Myrtle Beach LLC, George Martin, Vanessa Owens, Gerald Tipton.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/14/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Reeves, Phillip) |
Filing 7 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 2/25/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/11/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 3/11/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/1/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/2/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/1/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/1/2022, Discovery due by 8/1/2022, Motions due by 8/31/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 11/29/2022, Mediation Due by 8/1/2022. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 2/4/2022. (lgib, ) |
Filing 6 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Lucy Buffett, Tonya Clayton, Cheryl Coesens, Douglas "Todd" Goings, Robin Hinton, LuLus Myrtle Beach LLC, George Martin, Vanessa Owens, Gerald Tipton. (Reeves, Phillip) |
Filing 5 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Horry County. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Acknowledgement of State Clerk of Court of Notice of Removal)(Reeves, Phillip) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand by Katie Burdick. Response to Motion due by 2/7/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum of Law)No proposed order.(Davis, Lisa) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Lucy Buffett, Tonya Clayton, Cheryl Coesens, Douglas "Todd" Goings, Robin Hinton, LuLus Myrtle Beach LLC, George Martin, Vanessa Owens, Gerald Tipton.(hcic, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-26-07846 (filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10280530), filed by Robin Hinton, Douglas "Todd" Goings, Vanessa Owens, Gerald Tipton, Lucy Buffett, Cheryl Coesens, George Martin, Tonya Clayton, LuLus Myrtle Beach LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Amended Summons and Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Acceptance of Service Form)(hcic, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.