Clark v. Pressley et al
Plaintiff: Norris T. Clark
Defendant: Edward Pressley, Catherine Carter, Lawrence Pressley and Costella Pressley
Case Number: 4:2022cv00725
Filed: March 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Sherri A Lydon
Referring Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2022 Filing 22 Letter from Norris Clark. (Attachments: #1 Statements of Claim, #2 Application to Proceed_Update Request, #3 Envelope) (lgib, )
April 25, 2022 Filing 21 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Norris T. Clark, 700 Battery Park Road, Nesmith, SC 29580. Document Returned: #11 Proper Form Order and Notice, 12 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (prou, )
April 15, 2022 Filing 19 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #17 Order w/NEF, #18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Norris T. Clark, 700 Battery Park Road, Nesmith, SC 29580. (prou, )
April 15, 2022 Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends the district court dismiss this action. Objections to R&R due by 4/29/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 4/15/2022. (prou, )
April 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 4/15/2022. (prou, )
March 24, 2022 Filing 13 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #11 Proper Form Order and Notice w/NEF, Summons and four USM-285 Forms, 12 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Norris T. Clark, 700 Battery Park Road, Nesmith, SC 29580. (prou, )
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff has submitted an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, which is construed as a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. A review of the Motion reveals that Plaintiff should be relieved of the obligation to prepay the full filing fee. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. ECF No. #3 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/24/2022.(prou, )
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PROPER FORM ORDER AND NOTICE: Plaintiff may attempt to correct the defects in his Complaint by filing an amended complaint by March 31, 2022, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded that an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the undersigned will conduct a screening of the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the undersigned will recommend to the district court that the claims be dismissed without leave for further amendment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case to be brought into proper form by 3/31/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/24/2022. (prou, )
March 4, 2022 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Norris T. Clark. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )
March 4, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Norris T. Clark. Response to Motion due by 3/18/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(dsto, )
March 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Catherine Carter, Costella Pressley, Edward Pressley, Lawrence Pressley, filed by Norris T. Clark. Service due by 6/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document, #2 Envelope)(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Pressley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norris T. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Pressley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Catherine Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence Pressley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Costella Pressley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?