Cutshaw v. Durst et al
| Charles Ellis Cutshaw, Jr. |
| William C. Durst, Phillip J. Douglas, Anton C. Peterson, Renee Wright, Larry D. Cook, II, Dominique J. Daniels, Martin Delk, Roosevelt Gillyard, Frederick Freeman, Jr, Tiffany S. Williams, Alexis S. Tucker, Jermaine A. Mason and John Doe 1-10 |
| 4:2022cv00841 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Larry D. Cook, II, Dominique J. Daniels, Martin Delk, Phillip J. Douglas, William C. Durst, Frederick Freeman, Jr, Roosevelt Gillyard, Jermaine A. Mason, Anton C. Peterson, Alexis S. Tucker, Tiffany S. Williams, Renee Wright. Service due by 6/13/2022. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Charles Ellis Cutshaw, Jr.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larry D. Cook, II, Dominique J. Daniels, Martin Delk, Phillip J. Douglas, William C. Durst, Frederick Freeman, Jr, Roosevelt Gillyard, John Doe 1-10, Jermaine A. Mason, Anton C. Peterson, Alexis S. Tucker, Tiffany S. Williams, Renee Wright (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10389652), filed by Charles Ellis Cutshaw, Jr.. Service due by 6/13/2022.(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
