Reaves v. Medlin et al
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves |
Jason Medlin, Richmond County School System, Daniel Hucko, Cordero Foster, Patrick Dean Blanchard, Richmond County, Sheriff's Office, Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI), Georgia Applicant Processing System, GEMALTO/THALES, Clayton County Public Schools, Clarke County School District, Richmond County Sheriff's Office and Officer Sutton |
4:2022cv01868 |
June 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Thomas E Rogers |
Terry L Wooten |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Kathy Reaves. Response to Motion due by 6/27/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Patrick Dean Blanchard, Clarke County School District, Clayton County Public Schools, Cordero Foster, GEMALTO/THALES, Georgia Applicant Processing System, Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI), Daniel Hucko, Jason Medlin, Richmond County, Richmond County School System, Sheriff's Office, filed by Kathy Reaves. Service due by 9/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.