Adamo v. Experian et al
Plaintiff: Shawn P Adamo
Defendant: Experian and Brian Cassin
Case Number: 4:2022cv01941
Filed: June 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Referring Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2022 Filing 13 Letter from Lyndey R. Z. Bryant.(filed at the direction of chambers) (dsto, )
June 28, 2022 Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #11 Order to Notify of Address Change w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Shawn P. Adamo, 808 Cherry Blossom Drive, Murrells Inlet, SC, 29576 (dsto, )
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 06/28/2022. (dsto, )
June 28, 2022 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #9 Roseboro Order w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Shawn P. Adamo, 808 Cherry Blossom Drive, Murrells Inlet, SC, 29576 (dsto, )
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ROSEBORO ORDER directing clerk to forward summary judgment explanation to the opposing party and directing that party to respond in 31 days. Response due to #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Response to Motion due by 7/29/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 06/28/2022. (dsto, )
June 24, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Experian. Response to Motion due by 7/8/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(Bryant, Lyndey)
June 21, 2022 Filing 7 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 7 and 8 Reason: Deleted per attorney's request. Corrected Filing Document Number #3 . (prou, )
June 17, 2022 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Experian.(prou, ) . Modified on 6/21/2022 to replace with corrected document provided by filer and to correct filers (prou, ).
June 17, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Magistrates Court, case number 2022-CV-261091429. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10550429), filed by Experian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents)(prou, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adamo v. Experian et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn P Adamo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian
Represented By: Luke Montgomery Allen
Represented By: Lyndey Ritz Zwing Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Cassin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?