Thomas v. United States
Charles Ray Thomas, II |
United States |
4:2022cv02638 |
August 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph Dawson |
Sherri A Lydon |
Thomas E Rogers |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Review of Federal Agency Bids for Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: 10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, #9 Order - 1983 - No Service w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Charles Ray Thomas, II, 1901 W. Evans St, Unit 5372, Florence, SC, 29502 (dsto, ) |
Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the District Court dismiss this case with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Thus, the undersigned recommends the court decline to automatically give Plaintiff leave to amend. Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/17/2022. (dsto, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #9 No Serve Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/17/2022.(dsto, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/17/2022. (dsto, ) |
Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 6 Case Reassigned placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Charles Ray Thomas, II, 1901 W Evans St, Unit 5372, Florence, SC 29502 (glev, ) |
Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Joseph Dawson, III. Judge Honorable Sherri A Lydon no longer assigned to the case. (glev, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Charles Ray Thomas, II. Response to Motion due by 8/24/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, Block Florence County Federal Funding as per the Tucker Act by Charles Ray Thomas, II. Response to Motion due by 8/24/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States, filed by Charles Ray Thomas, II. Service due by 11/9/2022.(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomas v. United States | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charles Ray Thomas, II | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.