Long v. Horry County Sheriff's Department
William V. Long and William Von Long |
Horry County Sheriff's Department |
4:2022cv02644 |
August 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Donald C Coggins |
Thomas E Rogers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to William V. Long, #238950, Lieber Correctional Institution, PO Box 205, Ridgeville, SC, 29472 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by William V. Long. Response to Motion due by 9/26/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF, AO240 and Fin.Cert., placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to William V. Long, #238950, Lieber Correctional Institution, PO Box 205, Ridgeville, SC, 29472 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (dsto, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Horry County Sheriff's Department, filed by William V. Long. Service due by 11/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.