Livingston v. GoodLeap, LLC
Bobby Mason Livingston |
GoodLeap, LLC and Loanpal, LLC |
4:2022cv03627 |
October 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph Dawson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss by GoodLeap, LLC. Response to Motion due by 11/14/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Loan Documents - Redacted)No proposed order.(Guyton, Madison) |
Filing 6 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER GoodLeap, LLC answer due 10/31/2022. (Guyton, Madison) |
Filing 5 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Horry County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Acknowledgment of Removal)(Guyton, Madison) |
Filing 4 Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Bobby Mason Livingston.(Connor, Lawrence) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by GoodLeap, LLC. (lgib, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-26-05847 (filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10757053), filed by GoodLeap, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Process and Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Loan Documents - Redacted) (lgib, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.