Colberth v. State of South Carolina
| Jeffrey Rahim Colberth |
| State of South Carolina and Warden Evans Correctional Institution |
| 4:2022cv03701 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Jeffrey Rahim Colberth, #244635, Evans Correctional Institution, 610 Hwy. 9 West, Bennettsville, SC, 29615. Document Returned: #13 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, #14 Judgment. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #13 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation w/NEF, #14 Judgment w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Jeffrey Rahim Colberth, #244635, Evans Correctional Institution, 610 Hwy. 9 West, Bennettsville, SC, 29615 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 14 JUDGMENT by the Clerk. This petition is dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the respondent to file a return, as successive and unauthorized. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. (dsto, ) |
Filing 13
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: This Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein by reference. (ECF No. #9 ). Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the respondent to file a return, as successive and unauthorized.It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 12/05/2022. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #6 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer w/NEF, 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Jeffrey Rahim Colberth, #244635, Evans Correctional Institution, 610 Hwy. 9 West, Bennettsville, SC, 29615 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the 2254 Petition in this case be dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the respondent to file a return, as successive and unauthorized. Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/01/2022. (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #6 Serve No Answer Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/01/2022.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/01/2022. (Attachment(s) : #1 2254 Petition) (dsto, )
|
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jeffrey Rahim Colberth. Response to Motion due by 11/9/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jeffrey Rahim Colberth. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
