Cross v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Charles C Cross |
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing |
4:2022cv04333 |
November 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Thomas E Rogers |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. The time in which Defendant is to file the Electronic Administrative Record or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is reset and thereby extended to the originally scheduled answer date of March 30, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 1/5/2022.(gnan ) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to file the Certified Administrative Record. by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Response to Motion due by 1/19/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(Leach, David) |
Filing 9 STATUS REPORT by Charles C Cross. (Mayes, W) |
Filing 8 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 8 Reason: Incorrect filing by filing user. (gnan ) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 12/1/2022.(gnan ) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Social Security Appeals Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website.* Not later than thirty days from the entry of this Text Order, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a (1) signed and completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of the Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, or (2) status report informing the Court Plaintiff withholds consent to disposition of Plaintiff's appeal by a United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. https://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing_Order_Regarding_Social_Security_Cases.pdf Entered at the direction of Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/30/2022. Status Report due by 12/30/2022. (gnan ) |
Filing 5 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.02, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on or by 3/30/2023. (gnan, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Charles C Cross. Response to Motion due by 12/14/2022. No proposed order. Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(gnan ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.03 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website, filed by Charles C Cross.(gnan ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.