Gregorich v. Ciox Health, LLC et al
| Eugene Gregorich |
| Ciox Health, LLC, Trident Medical Center, LLC d/b/a Trident Medical Center and Seon Jones, MD |
| 4:2022cv04608 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Eugene Gregorich (Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Ciox Health, LLC.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/9/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 17 TEXT ORDER denying #15 Motion to Stay. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/1/2023. (gray) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Stay Response filed by Ciox Health, LLC.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/6/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay by Eugene Gregorich. Response to Motion due by 2/10/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memo in Support by Ciox Health, LLC, Seon Jones, MD, Trident Medical Center, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Supporting Documents Bendheim Declaration ISO Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit 1- Inflation adjustments, #4 Exhibit 2- 2022.06.16 Pl attorney Ltrt Trident Medical's Records Department, #5 Exhibit 3- Ciox invoice for delivery of electronic records)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Remand by Eugene Gregorich. Response to Motion due by 2/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Remand, #2 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.; granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.; granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, adding Andrew McCarty, Gilad Bendheim, and Jay Lefkowitz to Defendant attorney list, respectively. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 01/18/2023. (gray) Modified docket numbers to reflect correct order on 1/18/2023 (gray). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jay P. Lefkowitz ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10898203) by Ciox Health, LLC, Seon Jones, MD, Trident Medical Center, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/1/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for PHV Admission of Jay P. Lefkowitz)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gilad Y. Bendheim ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10896805) by Ciox Health, LLC, Seon Jones, MD, Trident Medical Center, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for PHV Admission of Gilad Bendheim)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrew F. McCarty ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10896463) by Ciox Health, LLC, Seon Jones, MD, Trident Medical Center, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit for PHV Admission of Andrew McCarty)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 7 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Eugene Gregorich. Seon Jones, MD served on 1/3/2023, answer due 1/24/2023. (Abbott, Blake) |
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Eugene Gregorich.(Abbott, Blake) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint Ciox Health, LLC answer due 1/19/2023. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 12/27/2022.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Ciox Health, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/5/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Abney, Merritt) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ciox Health, LLC.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022CP1005185. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10858813), filed by Ciox Health, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit 2 - Wells Declaration)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
