Hicks v. McLeod Health
| Vandaline L Hicks |
| McLeod Health |
| 4:2022cv04700 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/10/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/10/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/12/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 7/25/2023, Discovery due by 8/9/2023, Motions due by 9/8/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 12/7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 2/17/2023. (prou, )
|
| Filing 12 ADR STATEMENT/CERTIFICATION by McLeod Health(McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by McLeod Health.(McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 10 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by McLeod Health.(McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 9 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by McLeod Health.(McCoy, Ellison) Modified on 2/16/2023 to delete proposed order. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Vandaline L Hicks.(Babb, Julius) |
|
Filing 7
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 2/2/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 2/16/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 2/16/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/9/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/10/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/11/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/11/2023, Discovery due by 7/10/2023, Motions due by 8/9/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 11/7/2023, Mediation Due by 7/10/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 01/12/2023. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Vandaline L Hicks.(Babb, Julius) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by McLeod Health. (McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 4 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER McLeod Health answer due 1/12/2023. (McCoy, Ellison) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by McLeod Health with jury demand.(hcic, ) Modified on 1/3/2023 to edit text. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Florence County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-21-02111 (filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10867398), filed by McLeod Health. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(hcic, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hicks v. McLeod Health | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Vandaline L Hicks | |
| Represented By: | Julius Wistar Babb, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: McLeod Health | |
| Represented By: | Ellison Ford McCoy |
| Represented By: | Mallory Hart Gantt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
