Thomas v. Scanstat Technologies LLC et al
| Audrey Thomas |
| Scanstat Technologies LLC, McLeod Regional Medical Center doing business as McLeod Orthopaedics and Evan Hanna, MD |
| 4:2022cv04714 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Evan Hanna, MD, McLeod Regional Medical Center.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/28/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Samples, Thomas) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Scanstat Technologies LLC.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/28/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Rawl, A) |
| Filing 21 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Defendant, Evan Hanna, MD by Audrey Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Abbott, Blake) |
| Filing 19 TEXT ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff's response to #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and #12 MOTION to Dismiss by Evan Hanna due by 02/27/2023. Defendant's response to #14 Motion to Remand due by 2/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/6/2023. (gray) Added other motion to be ruled on on 2/6/2023 (gray, ). |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #12 MOTION to Dismiss , #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss , #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Response to Motion due by 2/17/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. ) by Audrey Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)No proposed order.(Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 17 TEXT ORDER denying #15 Motion to Stay. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/1/2023. (gray) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Kerry K Jardine on behalf of Scanstat Technologies LLC (Jardine, Kerry) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay by Audrey Thomas. Response to Motion due by 2/10/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Remand by Audrey Thomas. Response to Motion due by 2/9/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Remand, #2 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Mallory Hart Gantt on behalf of Evan Hanna, MD, McLeod Regional Medical Center (Gantt, Mallory) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Evan Hanna, MD, McLeod Regional Medical Center. Response to Motion due by 2/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.(Samples, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Chase Samples on behalf of Evan Hanna, MD, McLeod Regional Medical Center (Samples, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Scanstat Technologies LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - DHEC ANNUAL FEE FOR SEARCH AND DUPLICATION OF MEDICAL RECORD)No proposed order.(Rawl, A) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Evan Hanna, MD, McLeod Regional Medical Center.(Samples, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Audrey Thomas.(Doolittle, Paul) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Defendant, McLeod Regional Medical Center by Audrey Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Delivery)(Abbott, Blake) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Defendant, ScanSTAT Technologies LLC by Audrey Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Delivery)(Abbott, Blake) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer for All Defendants Evan Hanna, MD; McLeod Regional Medical Center; Scanstat Technologies, LLC answer due 1/23/2023. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 1/5/2023.(dgar) Modified on 1/18/2023 to edit docket text(dgar). |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer for All Defendants by Scanstat Technologies LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/18/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Rawl, A) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Scanstat Technologies LLC.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Florence County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-21-02443. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10868338), filed by Scanstat Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Declaration in Support of Notice of Removal).(vdru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
