Gallman v. Sutherland et al
John Gallman |
Amanda Sutherland and Horry County Department of Social Services |
4:2023cv00034 |
January 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph Dawson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Amanda Sutherland (Thomas, Lisa) |
Filing 5 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 1/26/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 2/9/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 2/9/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/2/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/3/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/3/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/3/2023, Discovery due by 7/3/2023, Motions due by 8/2/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 10/31/2023, Mediation Due by 7/3/2023. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 1/5/2023. (lgib, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Amanda Sutherland. (lgib, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Amanda Sutherland. (lgib, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-26-05734 (filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10874641), filed by Amanda Sutherland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Certificate of Service) (lgib, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.