Anderson v. Kingstree, The Town of et al
| Edward M. Anderson |
| Kingstree, The Town of and Richard Treme |
| 4:2023cv01123 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to The Town of Kingstree. Service due by 7/24/2023. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kingstree, The Town of, filed by Edward M. Anderson. Service due by 7/20/2023 (Millender, Elizabeth) (Main Document 7 replaced on 4/24/2023 with corrected document provided by filing user) (dsto, ) |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF, Complaint for Civil Case form and (2)Summons, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Edward M. Anderson, 115 McFarlin Street, Kingstree, SC, 29556 (dsto, ) |
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 4/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 03/31/2023. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Town of Kingstree, Richard Treme (Filing fee $402 receipt number 300103978), filed by Edward M. Anderson. Service due by 6/20/2023.(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
