Anderson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Jesse Edward Anderson
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Case Number: 4:2023cv01131
Filed: March 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Donald C Coggins
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ANSWER/ELECTRONIC CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/20/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12, #12 Part 13, #13 Part 14)(Leach, David)
May 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 400016091. (gnan )
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER adopting #7 Report and Recommendation denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall submit the required filing fee of $402.00 on or before May 5, 2023. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 4/21/2023.(gnan )
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by Jesse Edward Anderson. (Mayes, W)
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On the sole issue of this Report and Recommendation, it is recommended that the Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees be denied. It is recommended upon adoption of this report and recommendation that Plaintiff be ordered to pay the full filing fee of $402 within 14 days of the order by the district judge. Objections to R&R due by 4/14/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 3/31/2023. (prou, )
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Directing the parties' attention to the Court's Standing Order on All 42 U.S.C. 405(g) Social Security Disability Appeals Assigned to Judge Donald C. Coggins, Jr., located on the District Court's website. Within 30 days of the date of this Text Order, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file either a (1) signed and completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, or (2) status report informing the Court that Plaintiff does not consent to disposition of this action by Magistrate Judge. Status Report due by 4/21/2023. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 3/22/2023. (prou, )
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on 5/22/2023. (prou, )
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jesse Edward Anderson. Response to Motion due by 4/5/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(prou, )
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.03 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website, filed by Jesse Edward Anderson.(prou, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Edward Anderson
Represented By: W Daniel Mayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: David Leach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administrative Record
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?