Little v. Cutchin et al
| David Antonio Little, Jr. |
| Chesterfield County, Judge Paul M. Burch, Judge Roger M. Young, Solicitor William B. Rogers, Jr., Prosecutor Kernard Redmond, Attorney Tony Copeland-Little, Doctor Matthew Gaskins, Sheriff James Dixon, Jail Admin. Sheila Buckman, Officer Justin Thomas Cutchin, Bradley Redfearn, Officer K. Phillips, Sheriff Deputy G. Poison, Sheriff Deputy Marc Weiss, Sheriff Deputy Spence Vaughn, Sheriff Deputy Clay Sikes, Jailer Marcia Marine, Keith Thomas and Sheriff Deputy G. Polson |
| 4:2023cv01697 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by David Antonio Little, Jr. Response to Motion due by 7/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist)
|
|
Filing 13
Letter from David Antoinio Little Jr. to Defendants. (dist) (dist, ).
|
|
Filing 10
***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Proper Form Order, AO 240 form, blank summons, 4 blank USM-285 forms placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to David Antonio Little, Jr., 385407, McCormick Correctional Institute, 386 Redemtion Way, McCormick, SC 29899. (dist)
|
|
Filing 9
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 6/7/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 5/17/2023. (dist)
|
|
Filing 8
***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to David Antonio Little, Jr., 385407, McCormick Correctional Institute, 386 Redemtion Way, McCormick, SC 29899. (dist)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate all of the defendants except for Defendants Cutchin, Polson, Phillips, and Thomas from the above-referenced docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to assign a separate civil action number to Plaintiff in two new cases. One case, pertaining to Plaintiff's prosecution for the charges arising out of his February 2021 arrest, should include Defendants Copeland-Little, Gaskins, Burch, Rogers, and Redmond. The second case, pertaining to Plaintiff's conditions of confinement, should include Defendants Weiss, Sikes, Vaughn, Dixon, Buckman, Marine, Polson, Phillips, and Chesterfield County. The Clerk of Court shall file this order and Complaint as the initial docket entry in the newly created cases, and send those documents to Plaintiff with the newly created case numbers. G. Polson added. Chesterfield County, Tony Copeland-Little, James Dixon, Matthew Gaskins, Marcia Marine, G. Poison, Bradley Redfearn, Kernard Redmond, William B. Rogers, Jr, Clay Sikes, Spence Vaughn, Marc Weiss, Roger M. Young, Sheila Buckman and Paul M. Burch terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 5/15/2023. (dist)
|
|
Filing 4
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson/Greenwood. (dist)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David Antonio Little, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope)(dist)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
