Johnson v. Jackson
| Timothy Johnson and Timothy L. Johnson |
| S. Jackson |
| 4:2023cv01753 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by S. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Brown, Melody) |
| Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #16 Order 2254 w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Timothy Johnson, #370487, Lee Correctional Institution, 990 Wisacky Hwy., Bishopville, SC, 29010 (dsto, ) |
Filing 16
ORDER authorizing service of process. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum due by 7/27/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/07/2023. (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition)(dsto, )
|
| Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: 9 TEXT Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 10 TEXT Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Timothy Johnson, #370487, Lee Correctional Institution, 990 Wisacky Hwy., Bishopville, SC, 29010 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time in compliance with the prior Proper Form Order (ECF #5 ) with the new deadline being June 22, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/30/2023.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/30/2023.(dsto, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #5 Proper Form Order, by Timothy Johnson. Response to Motion due by 6/9/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Timothy Johnson. Response to Motion due by 6/9/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 Proper Form Order w/NEF and AO240, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Timothy Johnson, #370487, Lee Correctional Institution, 990 Wisacky Hwy., Bishopville, SC, 29010 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Petitioner is granted twenty-one (21) days to file a factual explanation with this court to show cause why his Petition should not be dismissed based on the application of the one-year limitation period established by 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). Case to be brought into proper form by 5/23/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 05/02/2023. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Timothy Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/5/2023: #2 Additional attachments, #3 Envelope) (dsto, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
