Small v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc
Plaintiff: Amos Small
Defendant: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc doing business as Love's Travel Stop #371
Case Number: 4:2023cv02029
Filed: May 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Joseph Dawson
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2023 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 8 Order on Motion to Remand (certified copy) to State Court placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Dillon County Clerk of Court PO Box 1220 Dillon, SC 29536-1220 (swel, )
June 23, 2023 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED 8 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court to Dillon County Clerk of Court (dilloncoc@bellsouth.net) (Attachments: #1 certified copy of Order of Remand) (swel, )
June 23, 2023 Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Consent Motion to Remand to State Court. "If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded." 28 U.S.C. 1447. To determine the amount in controversy for federal diversity jurisdiction, "[t]he court should examine the complaint at the time of removal in order to determine the amount in controversy." Thompson v. Victoria Fire & Cas. Co., 32 F. Supp. 2d 847, 848 (D.S.C. 1999) (citing St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 292 (1938)). However, when the initial complaint does not specify an amount, and a plaintiff enters a post-removal stipulation that the damages will not exceed the jurisdictional minimum, the post-removal stipulation "can be considered as a clarification of an ambiguous complaint, rather than a post-removal amendment of the plaintiff's complaint." Stanley v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 423 F. Supp. 3d 225, 229 (D.S.C. 2019) (quoting Carter v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc., 2013 WL 3946233, at *12 (D.S.C. July 31, 2013)); see also Gebbia v. WalMart Stores, Inc., 233 F.3d 880, 883 (5th Cir. 2000); Clifton v. Allen, 2018 WL 3095026, at *2 (D.S.C. June 22, 2018); Ferguson v. WalMart Stores, Inc., 1994 WL 653479, at *2 (D.S.C. Nov. 15, 1994). Therefore, a court may consider a post-removal stipulation of the amount in controversy when determining whether the jurisdictional minimum has been met. Id. Here, at the time of removal, Plaintiff had not specified an amount in the complaint. (DE 1-1.) Subsequently, the parties entered a post-removal Stipulation of Damages, stating "Plaintiff has now stipulated that he will neither seek nor accept total damages, recovery, or a judgment, including any interest that may accrue, exceeding Seventy-Four Thousand, Nine Hundred Ninety-nine and 00/100 ($74,999.00) Dollars, regardless of the numerous causes of action." (DE 7, p. 1.) After considering the post-removal stipulation, the Court grants the Consent Motion to Remand to State Court because the amount in controversy has not been met for diversity jurisdiction in this case. Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 6/23/23.(swel, )
June 7, 2023 Filing 7 Consent MOTION to Remand to State Court by Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. Response to Motion due by 6/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Brudvig, Kelsey)
May 16, 2023 Filing 6 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 6/6/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/20/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 6/20/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/11/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/10/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/11/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/11/2023, Discovery due by 11/13/2023, Motions due by 12/13/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 3/12/2024, Mediation Due by 11/13/2023. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 5/16/2023. (lgib, )
May 15, 2023 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. (lgib, )
May 15, 2023 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. (lgib, )
May 15, 2023 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. (lgib, )
May 15, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dillon County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-17-00159 (filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-11099347), filed by Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents) (lgib, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Small v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amos Small
Represented By: Marshall Solomon Weaver, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc doing business as Love's Travel Stop #371
Represented By: Kelsey Brudvig
Represented By: Kyle Lee Brady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?