Ham v. Hudson et al
| James Edward Ham |
| James Hudson and Mike Melton |
| 4:2023cv02619 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Kaymani D West |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #17 Order - 1983 - No Service w/NEF, #18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to James Edward Ham, #33828, Darlington County Detention Center, 2349 Rogers Rd, Darlington, SC 29532. (prou, )
|
|
Filing 18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. Objections to R&R due by 8/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/19/2023. (prou, )
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/19/2023. (prou, )
|
|
Filing 14
***DOCUMENT MAILED: 13 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to James Edward Ham, #33828, Darlington County Detention Center, 2349 Rogers Rd, Darlington, SC 29532. (prou, )
|
|
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 6/21/2023.(prou, )
|
|
Filing 11
***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #10 Proper Form Order and Notice w/NEF, Complaint form, Summons, and USM-285 Forms, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to James Edward Ham, #33828, Darlington County Detention Center, 2349 Rogers Rd, Darlington, SC 29532. (prou, )
|
|
Filing 10
PROPER FORM ORDER AND NOTICE: Plaintiff may attempt to correct the defects in his Complaint by filing an amended complaint by July 5, 2023, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded that an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the undersigned will conduct screening of the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the undersigned will recommend to the district court that the claims be dismissed without leave for further amendment. Case to be brought into proper form by 7/5/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 6/20/2023. (prou, )
|
|
Filing 4
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (prou, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by James Edward Ham. Response to Motion due by 6/26/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(prou, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against James Hudson, Mike Melton, filed by James Edward Ham. Service due by 9/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(prou, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
