Martin v. Lassley et al
| Anthony Fred Martin |
| T. Lassley, Susan Duffy, Donald Hagan, G. Palmer, B. Rogers and Curtis Early |
| 4:2023cv02857 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #11 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Anthony Fred Martin, #242768, Broad River Correctional Institution, 4460 Broad River Road, Columbia, SC, 29210 (dsto, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report (DE #5 ) and incorporates it by reference as modified herein. To proceed with this Complaint, Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee (currently $350) plus the $52 administrative fee for a total fee due of $402. Plaintiff is provided twenty-one (21) days to pay the filing fee, or the case will be dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 08/03/2023. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendation by Anthony Fred Martin. Reply to Objections due by 7/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/17/2023: #2 Additional Attachments) (dsto, ). |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Anthony Fred Martin, #242768, Broad River Correctional Institution, 4460 Broad River Road, Columbia, SC, 29210 (dsto, ) |
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) be denied. To proceed with this Complaint, Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee (currently $350) plus the $52 administrative fee for a total fee due of $402. It is further recommended that the Court give Plaintiff fourteen(14) days from the date the United States District Judge rules on this Report and Recommendation (or a specific date determined by the United States District Judge) to pay the full $402 filing fee, in which event this matter can be returned to the undersigned magistrate judge to conduct a review of Plaintiffs complaint. However, if Plaintiff fails to pay the full $402 filing fee within the time period set by the United States District Judge, or seek an extension of time to do so, it is further recommended that, by a self-executing Order or by additional Order of this District Court, the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance of service of process. Objections to R&R due by 7/13/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 06/29/2023. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson/Greenwood. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Anthony Fred Martin. Response to Motion due by 7/5/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Susan Duffy, Curtis Early, Donald Hagan, T. Lassley, G. Palmer, B. Rogers, filed by Anthony Fred Martin. Service due by 9/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
