Reaves v. Washington et al
| Kathy Reaves |
| Travis Washington, Dr. Rechel Anderson, Jasper County Board of Education, Kathryn M. Crews, Cathy Hazelwood and South Carolina Dept. of Education (S.C.D.E.) |
| 4:2023cv03847 |
| August 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Change Venue by Kathy Reaves. Response to Motion due by 9/20/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 14 Letter from Kathy Reaves. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
| Filing 12 OBJECTION to #8 Report and Recommendation by Kathy Reaves. Reply to Objections due by 9/13/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Report and Recommendation, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Scott Dennis, I on behalf of Rechel Anderson, Jasper County Board of Education, Travis Washington (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Dennis, Robert) (Main Document 10 and attachment replaced on 8/30/2023 to correct case number) (dsto, ) |
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #6 No Serve Order w/NEF, 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Kathy Reaves, PO Box 8806, Columbia, SC, 29202-8806 (dsto, ) |
Filing 8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the District Court dismiss the Complaint in this case pursuant to 1915(e) with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. After time for objections has run, it is recommended that a narrowly tailored prefiling injunction be issued as specifically discussed above and in regards to any new complaint, Plaintiff be ordered to file a "Motion for Leave to File Pursuant to Court Order" with the accompanying requirements as discussed above. Objections to R&R due by 9/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/23/2023. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #6 No Serve Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/23/2023.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/23/2023. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Beaufort. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Kathy Reaves. Response to Motion due by 8/18/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rechel Anderson, Kathryn M. Crews, Cathy Hazelwood, Jasper County Board of Education, South Carolina Dept. of Education (S.C.D.E.), Travis Washington, filed by Kathy Reaves. Service due by 11/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Supporting Documents) (dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
