United States of America v. $22,210.00 in United States Currency
United States of America |
$22,210.00 in United States Currency |
Christian Martinez |
4:2023cv04963 |
October 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
R Bryan Harwell |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Verified CLAIM by Christian Martinez re: $22,210.00 in United States Currency. (Parham, Rose) Modified on 11/8/2023 to edit text (hcic, ). |
Filing 7 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date November 4, 2023. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Advertisement Certification Report)(Sherard, Carrie) |
Filing 6 WARRANT Returned Executed as to $22,210.00. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Warrant of Arrest in rem and Return of Service)(Sherard, Carrie) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Action by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Sherard, Carrie) |
Filing 4 WARRANT FOR ARREST OF ARTICLES IN REM ISSUED (swel, ) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION FOR WARRANT FOR ARREST OF ARTICLES IN REM by United States of America. (swel, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $22,210.00 in United States Currency, filed by United States of America. Service due by 1/3/2024 (Attachments: #1 Verification)(swel, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.