Brown v. Aramark Food Services et al
Dominick Alexander Brown |
Aramark Food Services, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, Chief Patrick Morris and Moson Grant Meyer |
4:2023cv05598 |
November 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Thomas E Rogers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #9 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Dominick Alexander Brown, #589190, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, 3841 Leeds Avenue, North Charleston, SC, 29405 (dsto, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER and OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the R & R as the order of the Court. (Dkt. No. 5). The Court orders Plaintiff to pay the filling fee within twenty-one days of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee after twenty-one days, the Court orders the Clerk of Court to dismiss this action and enter final judgment. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 11/29/23. (ltap, ) |
Filing 7 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendation by Dominick Alexander Brown. Reply to Objections due by 12/1/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) (Main Document 7 replaced on 11/17/2023) (dsto, ). (Main Document 7 replaced on 11/17/2023) (dsto, ). |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Dominick Alexander Brown, #589190, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, 3841 Leeds Avenue, North Charleston, SC, 29405 (dsto, ) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) be denied. To proceed with this Complaint, Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee (currently $350) plus the $52 administrative fee for a total fee due of $402. It is further recommended that the Court give Plaintiff fourteen(14) days from the date the United States District Judge rules on this Report and Recommendation (or a specific date determined by the United States District Judge) to pay the full $402 filing fee, in which event this matter can be returned to the undersigned magistrate judge to conduct a review of Plaintiff's complaint. However, if Plaintiff fails to pay the full $402 filing fee within the time period set by the United States District Judge, or seek an extension of time to do so, it is further recommended that, by a self-executing Order or by additional Order of this District Court, the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance of service of process. Objections to R&R due by 11/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/7/2023. (dsto, ) |
Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (dsto, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Dominick Alexander Brown. Response to Motion due by 11/17/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Al Cannon Detention Center, Aramark Food Services, Moson Grant Meyer, Patrick Morris, filed by Dominick Alexander Brown. Service due by 2/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.