Harris v. South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic
James Franklin Harris |
South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic |
4:2023cv05905 |
November 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
David C Norton |
Thomas E Rogers |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER Entry #7 Reason: to correct filing error. Corrected Filing Document Number #8 & #9 . (dsto) |
Filing 9 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic.(Darwin, Andrew) Modified on 12/20/2023 to correct filing date. (dsto, ) |
Filing 8 Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic.(Darwin, Andrew) Modified on 12/20/2023 to correct filing date. (dsto, ) |
Filing 6 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic.(Darwin, Andrew) |
Filing 5 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 12/7/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 12/21/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 12/21/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/16/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 2/15/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/18/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/23/2024, Discovery due by 8/9/2024, Motions due by 8/23/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 8/23/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 9/24/2024, ADR Statement due by 7/26/2024, Mediation Due by 9/10/2024. Motions in limine must be filed at least one week prior to date of trial. Parties shall furnish the Court pretrial briefs five (5) business days prior to the date set for trial. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 11/17/2023. (dsto, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic. (dsto, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic.(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Spartanburg County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-42-03931. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-11435321), filed by South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harris v. South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Franklin Harris | |
Represented By: | Lola S Richey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections Tyger River Medical Clinic | |
Represented By: | Andrew Todd Darwin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.