Whitmore v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Robert Whitmore, III
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Case Number: 4:2023cv07032
Filed: December 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2024 Filing 14 Additional Attachments to Main Document #13 MOTION to Dismiss . First attachment description: Certificate of Service . (Leach, David)
February 26, 2024 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Response to Motion due by 3/11/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Supporting Documents Declaration in Support of Motion)No proposed order.(Leach, David) Modified on 2/26/2024. See additional attachment at #14 . (gnan ).
January 12, 2024 Filing 11 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #9 Proper Form Order w/NEF, 10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and Social Security Complaint Form, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Robert Whitmore, III, 467 Harmon Quarter Road, Prosperity, SC 29127. (prou, )
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #9 Proper Form Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 1/12/2024.(prou, )
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 2/2/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 1/12/2024. (prou, )
January 4, 2024 Filing 8 Letter from Robert Whitmore, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(gnan )(Modified on 1/5/2024 to replace Main Document with corrected document). (gnan ).
January 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/3/2024. (gnan ) (Modified on 1/3/2024 to replace Main Document with correct case number). (gnan, ).
December 29, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Robert Whitmore, III. (hcic, )
December 29, 2023 Filing 4 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue.Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on or by 2/29/2024. (hcic, )
December 29, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Robert Whitmore, III. Response to Motion due by 1/12/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III. (hcic, )
December 29, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration filed by Robert Whitmore, III. Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.03 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website. (hcic, ) Entered 12/29/2023. (Modified on 1/12/2024 to add Additional attachment(s): #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (gnan ). (Modified on 1/23/2024 to add Additional attachment(s). #3 Social Security Complaint, #4 Supporting Documents received on 1/23/2024, #5 Envelope received on 1/23/2024). (gnan ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitmore v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Whitmore, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: David Leach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administrative Record
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?