Hunter v. Stirling et al
| Troy Darnell Hunter |
| Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen |
| 4:2024cv00547 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time within which to make a return or otherwise plead. Time is extended up to and including April 29, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 03/29/2024.(dsto)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time by Levern Cohen. Response to Motion due by 4/11/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(Maye, William) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Levern Cohen. (Brown, Melody) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER authorizing service of process. Return and Memorandum due by March 29, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 02/08/2024. (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition)(dsto, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00 Receipt number ASCDC-11566476), filed by Troy Darnell Hunter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Idena Titus Statement)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
