Jordan v. Payment Saver, LLC et al
| Joshua Jordan |
| Payment Saver, LLC and Casey Graham |
| 4:2024cv00890 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 Order Service - Non-Inmate w/NEF, (3) copies of #7 Order, (2) copies of #1 Complaint and #8 Summons Issued, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Joshua Jordan, 3223 Twin Church Road, Timmonsville, SC, 29161 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Casey Graham, Payment Saver, LLC. Service due by 6/5/2024. (dsto, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER authorizing service of process and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Because Plaintiff paid the full filing fee, Plaintiff is responsible for service of process under Rule 4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 03/07/2024. (dsto, )
|
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by Joshua Jordan.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Casey Graham, Payment Saver, LLC (Filing fee $405 receipt number 400016384), filed by Joshua Jordan. Service due by 5/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Declaration of Plaintiff)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
