Timmons v. Smith
| Wondell Timmons, Jr. |
| Corporal Smith |
| 4:2024cv00937 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Kaymani D West |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, #19 Order w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Wondell Timmons, Jr., 346 Gause St., Mullins, SC 29574. (prou, ) |
| Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends the court dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 5/1/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 4/17/2024. (prou, ) |
Filing 19
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 4/17/2024. (prou, )
|
| Filing 13 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: 12 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #11 Proper Form Order w/NEF, previously completed Summons Form, Summons Form and USM-285 Form, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Wondell Timmons, Jr., 346 Gause St., Mullins, SC 29574. (prou, ) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #11 Proper Form Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/1/2024.(prou, )
|
|
Filing 11
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 3/22/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/1/2024. (prou, )
|
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wondell Timmons, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(prou, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Wondell Timmons, Jr. Response to Motion due by 3/8/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(prou, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corporal Smith, filed by Wondell Timmons, Jr. Service due by 5/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Supporting Document, #3 Envelope)(prou, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Timmons v. Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wondell Timmons, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Corporal Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
