Hopkins v. Darlington City Police Dept. et al
Kimberly Hopkins |
Darlington City Police Dept., Mike Melton, Sheila Baccus, Kim Nelson and Curtis Boyd |
4:2024cv01714 |
April 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Thomas E Rogers |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 Proper Form Order w/NEF and prisoner civil rights complaint form, 8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Kimberly Hopkins, 2769 Oates Hwy., Lamar, SC, 29069 (dsto, ) |
|
|
Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Kimberly Hopkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Kimberly Hopkins. Response to Motion due by 4/19/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) |
Filing 2 Letter from Kimberly Hopkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sheila Baccus, Curtis Boyd, Darlington City Police Dept., Mike Melton, Kim Nelson, filed by Kimberly Hopkins. Service due by 7/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.