Prezioso et al v. Noble et al
| Joseph Prezioso and Danelle Prezioso |
| C. Dean Noble and Jacqueline Scism Noble |
| 4:2024cv04596 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by Danelle Prezioso, Joseph Prezioso. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Reply Exhibit A)(Redman, George) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by C. Dean Noble(as Trustee of the C. Dean Noble Revocable Trust), C. Dean Noble(individually), Jacqueline Scism Noble(individually), Jacqueline Scism Noble(as Trustee of the Jacqueline Scism Noble Revocable Trust).Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/15/2024 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Plaintiffs' Letter to Defendants Regarding Notice of Representation & Demand for Cure, #2 Exhibit B Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants' Second Set of Interrogatories)(Brown, Kierra) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION to Stay re #5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Danelle Prezioso, Joseph Prezioso. Response to Motion due by 10/7/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Redman, George) |
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Danelle Prezioso, Joseph Prezioso. Response to Motion due by 10/7/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proofs of Service of Complaint, #2 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Remand, #3 Exhibit Affidavit Exhibit A Proofs of Service of Complaint, #4 Exhibit Affidavit Exhibit B Notice of Removal)No proposed order.(Redman, George) |
| Filing 4 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/10/2024, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 10/24/2024, Rule 26 Report due by 10/24/2024, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/14/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 12/16/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/15/2025, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 1/15/2025, Discovery due by 3/17/2025, Motions due by 4/16/2025, Jury Selection Deadline 7/15/2025, Mediation Due by 3/17/2025. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 9/19/2024. (lgib, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by C. Dean Noble(as Trustee of the C. Dean Noble Revocable Trust), C. Dean Noble(individually), Jacqueline Scism Noble(individually), Jacqueline Scism Noble(as Trustee of the Jacqueline Scism Noble Revocable Trust). (lgib, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-26-06686 (filing fee $405 receipt number ASCDC-11949862), filed by Jacqueline Scism Noble (individually), C. Dean Noble (as Trustee of the C. Dean Noble Revocable Trust), Jacqueline Scism Noble (as Trustee of the Jacqueline Scism Noble Revocable Trust), C. Dean Noble (individually). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1 - Notice to Pltf of Removal, #2 Exhibit A-2 - Notice to State Court of Removal, #3 Exhibit B- State Court Pleadings) (lgib, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
