Trexler et al v. Richland County Humane SPCA et al
Hazelene E Trexler and Terry A Trexler |
Richland County Humane SPCA, Michelle Hart, Kelly Graham, Josh Gowans, Richland Humane SPCA Board Members and Wayne Brennessel |
5:2009cv02173 |
August 14, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Orangeburg Office |
Richland |
Paige J Gossett |
R Bryan Harwell |
Both |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting 15 Report and Recommendations, terminating as moot 14 Motion to Expedite, denying 5 Motion to Consolidate Cases. The case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for Calhoun County. Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 10/20/2009. (jpet, ) |
Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that this matter be remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for Calhoun County, re 1 Notice of Removal, that the defendants' motion to consolidate be denied, re 5 MOTION to Consolidate Cases, and that the defendants' motion to expedite be terminated as moot, re 14 MOTION to Expedite Status Conference/Hearing on Consolidation Objections to R&R due by 10/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 9/25/2009. (jpet, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.