McCoy v. City of Columbia et al
| Jonathan David McCoy |
| City of Columbia, John K Passmore, James Heywood and Amanda H Long |
| Ashleigh Messervy |
| 5:2010cv00132 |
| January 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Richland |
| Kaymani D West |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
268
ORDER denying 260 Motion to Bifurcate, granting 261 MOTION in Limine Related to Authenticity of Records from the City of Columbia with regard to plaintiff's Exhibit 35, granting in part and denying in part 263 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence, granting in part and denying in part 265 MOTION in Limine. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 03/15/2013.(bshr, )
|
|
Filing
253
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting in part and denying in part 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment On Constitutionality of City of Columbia Municipal Ordinance Section 10-34 (b), finding that genuine issues of material fact preclude granting summary judgment to either the City or to McCoy on the issue of whether the Ordinance was unconstitutionally applied to McCoy in this case and denying 200 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Summary J udgment regarding the constitutionality of the Ordinance; granting 203 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to McCoy's claims under 1983; denying 200 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Summary Judgment on McCoy's 1983 cla ims; granting 200 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Summary Judgment and 203 MOTION for Summary as to McCoy's state law tort claims for malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and assault and battery' granting 203 MOTION for Summary as to McCoy's claims for punitive damages; AND notifying parties the case will proceed to trial on the constitutionality of the Ordinance as applied to McCoy during his arrest and on the City's liability, if any, under 1983. Signed by the Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr on 03/11/2013. (bshr, )
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER: Movant's motion to quash, ECF No. 158 , and motion for protective order, ECF No. 165 are denied. The parties are to schedule the continuation of Movant's deposition at a mutually convenient time. The June 1 9, 2012 discovery deadline, and all other remaining deadlines, remain in place; however, the parties may conduct the continued deposition of Movant at a time outside the deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 6/19/2012.(mcot, )
|
|
Filing
156
Movant's motion to rescind the court's prior order holding a ruling in abeyance ECF No. 155 , is granted. Movant's motion to quash the deposition subpoena, ECF No. 126 , is denied. In the event other legal issues arise (or have arisen) regarding Movant's deposition, Movant and/or the parties should submit appropriate motions to the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/16/2012.(mcot, )
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER: The court finds the City appropriate asserted the privilege or protection over the documents reviewed in camera. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 4/27/2012. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
