Straws v. Roach et al
Plaintiff: Jabbar J Straws
Defendant: Susan Blake, Singlee and Johnson
Case Number: 5:2011cv00132
Filed: January 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Orangeburg Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Presiding Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with this court's orders, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the factors outlined in Chandler Leasing Corp., 669 F.2d at 920. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/2/2012. (mcot, )
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER: Plaintiff is hereby directed to provide to the Clerk of Court, within ten (10) days of this Order, an updated summons and Form USM-285 with Defendant Michael Singley's current, correct name and street address for service of process. One (1) blank summons form and one (1) blank form USM-285 are attached to this Order for Plaintiff's use. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 9/25/2012. (mcot, )
September 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Defendant Blake's Motion for Summary Judgment 113 by October 8, 2012. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action against Defendant Blake will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 9/20/2012. (mcot, )
August 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The court adopts the Report 100 and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendants Roach, Oberman, Pract, James, Patterson, Pate, and Boyd (Dkt. # 58 , 76 , and 85 ) are GRANTED and that Plaintiff's claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 8/1/2012. (mcot, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Straws v. Roach et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jabbar J Straws
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Blake
Represented By: Daniel C Plyler
Represented By: William Henry Davidson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Singlee
Represented By: Ashley Sumner Heslop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?