Sheppard v. Forrest et al
| Dexter Antonio Sheppard |
| Robert Forrest, Tim Riley, Jon Ozmint, Gary Lane, Anne Hall, Jerry C Alexander, Christine Thompson, Laura Caldwell and RL Turner |
| 5:2011cv00486 |
| March 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Spartanburg |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Kaymani D West |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER denying 46 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting 60 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 62 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; denying 63 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 64 Motion for Subpoenas . It is ORDERED that Counsel for Defendants shall file a status report with the court no later than March 14, 2012, providing information regarding any and all requests for legal materials Plaintiff has made from November 17, 2011 through February 29 , 2012, and whether Plaintiff has been provided with the materials requested. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment 72 no later than March 28, 2012. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action may be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 2/29/2012.(mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
