McElrath v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| Andrew Marshall McElrath |
| Chris Golden and South Carolina Department of Corrections |
| 5:2013cv00317 |
| February 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Richland |
| Mary G Lewis |
| Kaymani D West |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
379
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court overrules the plaintiff's objections and, to the extent it does not contradict this order, adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 373 . Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 1/23/2015. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
291
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court ACCEPTS and incorporates the Report, (Doc. # 280 ), by reference into this Order. Defendant CO Gerity's Motion for Summary Judgment is thereby GRANTED, (Doc. # 171 ), and Plaintiff's Complaint as to Defendant CO Gerity and the March 8, 2013 hand incident is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 12/12/2013. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
282
ORDER denying Plaintiff's motions, ECF Nos. 71 , 190 , 197 , 236 , to amend his Complaint. Plaintiff's Motions to Compel, ECF Nos. 192 , 204 , 210 , 235 , are denied in part, and granted in part. No new disco very requests may be served in this case until Defendant Gerity's summary judgment motion is resolved. Plaintiff is ordered to immediately cease from filing duplicative and repetitious motions. Plaintiff is cautioned that should he fail to comply with the court's order, Plaintiff's action may be subject to dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 11/21/2013.(mcot, )
|
|
Filing
270
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court hereby ACCEPTS the Report (Doc. # 205 ). Defendant Chris Golden's Motion for Summary Judgment is thereby GRANTED, (Doc. # 64 ), and the Plaintiff's Complaint is di smissed without prejudice as against Defendant Chris Golden. Several of Plaintiff's numerous pending motions, (Docs. # 151 , 167 , 187 and 203 ), are therefore properly terminated as MOOT. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 11/14/2013. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER denying 166 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 177 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 177 Motion for the Courts Assistance in Recovering Subpoena Information that is Relevant to my Case. Plaintiff is further informed that the court will no consider any further motions for appointment of counsel unless this matter proceeds to trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/26/2013.(mcot, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation 31 is incorporated herein by reference and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process as to De fendants South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lee Price and Leighann Price. This case will continue to proceed against Defendant Chris Golden. This matter is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial handling. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 5/3/2013. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
