Holloway v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| John Holloway |
| Wayne McCabe, FSS Butler, South Carolina Department of Corrections and Joseph McFadden |
| 5:2013cv01473 |
| May 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Florence |
| Mary G Lewis |
| Kaymani D West |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: the Court adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation 21 by reference in this Order. For the reasons stated above and in the Report and Recommendation, this matter is REMA NDED to the Court of Common Pleas for the County of Florence, State of South Carolina. The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward the file along with a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of Court for Florence County. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 8/30/2013. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER. Plaintiff to advise the court, in writing, no later than June 17, 2013, whether he is pursuing any claims for violations of his federal constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in this action, if he is in stead only pursuing claims under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act and the South Carolina Constitution, or whether he is pursuing claims under both South Carolina and federal law. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 06/03/2013. (dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
