Buff v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| David Keith Buff |
| South Carolina Department of Corrections, Wayne McCabe, Ann Sheppard, Dessirene Lloyd, Carl Von Mutius, Justin Aranda and Douglas Cook |
| 5:2013cv01901 |
| July 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Dorchester |
| Kaymani D West |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is therefore ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED (Doc. # 119 ), and Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED (Doc. # 121 ). Defendants' motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED. (Doc. # 108 ). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 8/10/2015. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. # 65 ). Accordingly, Defendant South Carolina Department of Correction's Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 26 ) is hereby GRANTED and the claims against South Carolina Department of Corrections are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 8/6/2014. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
