Mason v. South Carolina

Mason v. South Carolina

Petitioner:	Julie Melton Mason
Respondent:	Warden, Graham Correctional Institution
Case Number:	5:2015cv04963
Filed:	December 15, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Orangeburg Office
County:	Pickens
Presiding Judge:	R Bryan Harwell
Presiding Judge:	Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 20, 2017	Filing 45 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court overrules Petitioner's objections and adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 35 ] by reference. The Court GRANTS Respondent's motion for s ummary judgment [ECF No. 17 ] and DENIES AND DISMISSES Petitioner's § 2254 petition with prejudice. The Court DENIES a certificate of appeability because Petitioner has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 3/20/2017. (mcot, )
May 23, 2016	Filing 20 ORDER: Petitioner is directed to advise the court whether she wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 17 , by June 23, 2016. Petitioner is further advised that if she fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/23/2016. (mcot, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 20, 2017

Filing 45 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court overrules Petitioner's objections and adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 35 ] by reference. The Court GRANTS Respondent's motion for s ummary judgment [ECF No. 17 ] and DENIES AND DISMISSES Petitioner's § 2254 petition with prejudice. The Court DENIES a certificate of appeability because Petitioner has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 3/20/2017. (mcot, )

May 23, 2016

Filing 20 ORDER: Petitioner is directed to advise the court whether she wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 17 , by June 23, 2016. Petitioner is further advised that if she fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/23/2016. (mcot, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mason v. South Carolina
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Julie Melton Mason
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Graham Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?