McCurley v. Flowers Foods Inc et al
Plaintiff: Paul McCurley, III
Defendant: Flowers Foods Inc and Derst Baking Company LLC
Case Number: 5:2016cv00194
Filed: January 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Orangeburg Office
County: Orangeburg
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 171 JOINT ORDER REGARDING INDIVIDUALS WHO FAILED TO SIGN NEW DISTRIBUTOR AGREEMENTS. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 11/14/2018. (asni, )
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 168 JUDGMENT approving the class and collective settlement agreement and dismissing the case with prejudice. (asni, )
November 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER certifying the class as stated. The court next APPROVES the Notice and Consent Form (ECF No. 71-1) submitted by the parties and the putative members of the collective action will have sixty days from the date notices are mailed to opt-in to this action. Finally, the court APPROVES all remaining agreed upon provisions of the parties' Joint Stipulation (ECF No. 71). Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 11/14/2016. (asni, )
October 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER AND OPINION granting 45 Motion for Conditional Certification and Judicial Notice. Defendants shall have until October 31, 2016, to submit additional briefing regarding(1) the inclusion in the class of distributors who have signed an arbitration agreement and (2) their objections to Plaintiff's proposed Notice. Plaintiff shall have until November 7, 2016, to file a response to Defendants' submission. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 10/24/2016.(asni, ) (Main Document 69 replaced on 10/24/2016) (asni, ). Modified to replace document and correct docket text on 10/24/2016 (asni, ). Modified to edit text on 10/24/2016 (asni, ).
March 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 34 Motion for Confidentiality Order. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/29/2016.(asni, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCurley v. Flowers Foods Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul McCurley, III
Represented By: Christopher James Moore
Represented By: Matthew Anderson Nickles
Represented By: Terry Edward Richardson, Jr
Represented By: Brady Ryan Thomas
Represented By: James F Walsh, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flowers Foods Inc
Represented By: Michael Oliver Eckard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Derst Baking Company LLC
Represented By: Michael Oliver Eckard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?