Spears v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
Petitioner: James A Spears
Respondent: Warden FCI Williamsburg
Case Number: 5:2016cv00671
Filed: February 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Orangeburg Office
County: Williamsburg
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Presiding Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 JUDGMENT by the clerk. This case is dismissed. (dsto, )
May 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts in part and declines to adopt in part the Report (ECF No. 17 ), and recommits the matter to the Magistrate Judge for further handling. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 05/20/2016. (dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spears v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James A Spears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden FCI Williamsburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?