Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Hughes et al
| Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina |
| George W Hughes and Betty K Vandervort |
| 5:2016cv01022 |
| April 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| XUS, Outside State |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
Order Granting 35 MOTION to Vacate Stay of Proceedings filed by Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina. Order Vacating 32 Order Staying Case. The clerk is directed to reopen Plaintiff's motion for summ ary judgment (ECF No. 25) and Defendant Vandervort's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 27). The time limitations to file any appropriate responses or replies not yet filed in accordance with Local Civ. Rule 7.067.07 (D.S.C.) shall begin to run on the date of the entry of this order. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 5/9/17. (mflo, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL/RULE 16 CONFERENCE notifying parties the court will conduct a Rule 16 conference in Chambers on Friday, July 8, 2016 at 10:15 a.m. in the Matthew J. Perry, Jr. Federal Courthouse, 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 06/27/2016. (bshr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
