Thomas v. Meeks
Petitioner: Michael Scott Thomas
Respondent: BJ Meeks
Case Number: 5:2016cv01067
Filed: April 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Orangeburg Office
County: Williamsburg
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Presiding Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: This Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 22 ) as the Order of the Court, GRANTS RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 16 ), DENIES THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND DISMISSES THE PETITION WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/17/2017. (mcot, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Meeks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Scott Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BJ Meeks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?