Wolfe v. Warden
Petitioner: Joseph William Wolfe
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 5:2016cv02449
Filed: July 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Orangeburg Office
County: Edgefield
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Presiding Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER: The court finds Wolfe's objections are without merit and adopts the 20 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12 ) is GRANTED, and the petition is DISMISSED. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 7/21/2017. (prou, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wolfe v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph William Wolfe
Represented By: Jeremy Brian Gordon
Represented By: Ernest Charles Grose, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?