Hamilton v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit South Carolina District Court Hamilton v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Hamilton v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Wilhelmina Cromwell Hamilton
Defendant:	Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Case Number:	5:2016cv03471
Filed:	October 24, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Orangeburg Office
County:	Charleston
Presiding Judge:	R Bryan Harwell
Presiding Judge:	Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 29, 2017	Filing 42 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 40 ]. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 8/29/2017. (prou, )
July 12, 2017	Filing 33 ORDER: Plaintiff has failed to file her Brief with the court. As such, it appears to the court that she wishes to abandon this action. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether she wishes to con tinue with this case and to file a Plaintiffs Brief by July 26,2017. Plaintiff is further advised that if she fails to file her Brief, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/12/2017. (gnan, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 29, 2017

Filing 42 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 40 ]. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 8/29/2017. (prou, )

July 12, 2017

Filing 33 ORDER: Plaintiff has failed to file her Brief with the court. As such, it appears to the court that she wishes to abandon this action. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether she wishes to con tinue with this case and to file a Plaintiffs Brief by July 26,2017. Plaintiff is further advised that if she fails to file her Brief, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/12/2017. (gnan, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamilton v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilhelmina Cromwell Hamilton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?