Blakely v. Stirling et al
| James G Blakely |
| B.P. Stirling, M McCall, D Bush, M Stephan and Sgt Jackson |
| 5:2017cv01040 |
| April 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Richland |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections, adopts the 9 Report, and incorporates it herein. The refore, it is the judgment of this Court Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff is given 15 days from the date of the issuance of this Order to pay the filing fee of $400, and the Office of the Cler k of Court shall withhold entry of judgment until such time expires. If Plaintiff fails to timely pay the filing fee, the Complaint shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under the "three strikes" rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Clerk shall enter the required final judgment at the close of the 15-day period permitted for payment of the filing fee. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 5/18/2017. (prou, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/10/2017. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
