American Service Insurance Company v. OnTime Transport LLC et al
| American Service Insurance Company |
| OnTime Transport LLC, Amy Harmon, Paul Weatherford, Kelli Rucker and Kevin Smith |
| 5:2017cv01120 |
| April 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Orangeburg |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 10/9/2019. (asni, )
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion for Summary Judgment. Specifically, the court finds American Service Insurance Company owes no duty of defense under the Auto Policy, but does owe a duty of de fense under the CGL Policy. The court also DISMISSES OnTime's first through eleventh counterclaims (ECF No. 49 ). The court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART OnTime's twelfth counterclaim (ECF No. 49 ). Specifically, the court concludes that American Service Insurance Company owes no duty of defense under the Auto Policy, but does owe a duty of defense under the CGL Policy. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 8/22/2019.(asni, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
